Unreported Trips by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, Senator Reveals
1. Overview
Date: June 13, 2023
Source: Reuters
Location: Washington, D.C.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas took at least three additional trips funded by billionaire benefactor Harlan Crow, which he failed to disclose. This revelation was made by Senator Dick Durbin, the Democratic chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
2. Details of Unreported Trips (2017-2021)
2.1 Private Jet Travel
# | Year | Route | Purpose |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2017 | St. Louis, Montana → Dallas | Not Disclosed |
2 | 2019 | Washington → Savannah, Georgia | Not Disclosed |
3 | 2021 | Washington → San Jose, California | Not Disclosed |
Senator’s Statement: Senator Durbin disclosed these details after a Judiciary Committee vote last November authorized subpoenas to Harlan Crow and Leonard Leo, another influential conservative figure.
3. Specific Trips and Omissions
- Bali and California (2019): Justice Thomas acknowledged that Crow paid for his “food and lodging” but did not disclose travel by private jet.
- Indonesia (Eight-day Excursion): Private jet travel and yacht expenses were omitted.
4. Committee Investigation
Crow, a Texas businessman and Republican donor, agreed to provide information dating back seven years in exchange for the committee ending its probe into him. Despite concerns about the inquiry’s legality, Crow engaged in negotiations to resolve the matter.
Crow’s Statement: “Mr. Crow engaged in good faith negotiations with the committee from the beginning to resolve the matter,” said Michael Zona, Crow’s spokesperson.
5. Supreme Court’s Response
The Supreme Court did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Durbin’s Statement: “The Senate Judiciary Committee’s ongoing investigation into the Supreme Court’s ethical crisis is producing new information and makes it crystal clear that the highest court needs an enforceable code of conduct,” Durbin said.
6. Code of Conduct Adoption
Under pressure, the Supreme Court adopted its first code of conduct in November. Critics argue that it does not go far enough to promote transparency and leaves recusal decisions to the justices without enforcement mechanisms.
For more details, read the full article on Reuters .
Latest Post
- How Much Life Insurance Coverage Do You Really Need?
- Comparing America’s Best: Stanford, UC Berkeley, Harvard, UMich, MSU
- California Institute of Technology Student Scholarship Program – by lena prmas
- Exploring Academic Frontiers: Stanford, UC Berkeley, Harvard, UMich, MSU
- Harvard University Student Scholarship Program inform by alice browin
Comment according to the rules. Every comment is reviewed.
comment url